< link rel="DCTERMS.replaces" href="http://girlontheright.blogspot.com/" > < meta name="DC.identifier" content="http://www.girlontheright.com" > Girl on the Right

 

Girl on the Right.

For Girls With Pearls.

  Contact RightGirl

Blogroll Me!

Site Feed

02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008

 

Wednesday, June 15, 2005

Religion of Peace Redux 

An Indian woman who was allegedly raped by her father-in-law is now being ordered by a Muslim council of community elders to marry him.

The council says under Islamic law the rape has nullified her marriage, according to media reports.

Because, you know, I'd want to marry my rapist. How 'bout you?

In this case, the Muslim council is actually arguing with the Sharia courts. Go figure. I guess maybe Mohammed didn't leave things quite as black and white as the Muslims claim he did...

But a top Muslim body in India has rejected the argument saying it is not valid under Sharia (Islamic) law.

It says the council was not authorised to give such a verdict and added that the alleged rapist should be punished.

Never thought I'd agree with a Sharia court, but I digress.

Reports say the 28-year-old woman was raped when she was alone at home in Charthawal, in the norther Indian state of Uttar Pradesh.

When the incident came to the notice of the council, it ordered that she marry her father-in-law and change her relationship with her husband to that between a mother and son.

It also ordered her to leave her home and stay away for seven month and 10 days to become "pure".

So not only was she raped, and is being forced to marry her attacker, but apparently she's a dirty slut, too. Insult to injury. I'm certain she's feeling rather impure, but frankly, that's not her fault, and it shouldn't be up to the council to point it out.

India's National Commission of Women has also asked for a report from the government in the state of Uttar Pradesh, where the incident took place.

"We have requested the government to take action against the guilty and also pay compensation to the victim," NCW president Girija Vyas told the BBC.

A representative of a top Muslim body in India, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, said the case should be dealt under Islamic law.

"Under the Sharia law, whatever happened with the victim is wrong and if her father-in-law has raped her, he should be sentenced to death," the representative, Zafarab Geelani, said.

No mention of what should happen to her, though. If she was alone, there are no witnesses, and under Sharia law, three witnesses (men) are needed to support a rape claim. If it is found that the woman has been raped, she is often also sentenced to death, because she's used goods, and the husband/family/village will no longer support her.

Which is the lesser of two evils?

|
 


  

 

 



 
 

  Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

 

 

 

This blog and its content - including opinions, observations, and general rants - is the sole property of RightGirl and Contributors (where applicable), and is not in any ways reflective of other persons or organizations, including the employer(s) of RightGirl and Contributors. Emails addressed to RightGirl are considered to be property of RightGirl, and may be used herewith. Should you prefer to have your name, email address, IP address or content withheld, please indicate this in the subject line of the email.

cocolaw.com

attorney4kids.com

wizardoflaw.com

RightWingStuff.com - Back-handing the Left into Submission! Support This Site

 

Copyright RightGirl 2004-2007© Stealing is for liberals and democrats.