< link rel="DCTERMS.replaces" href="http://girlontheright.blogspot.com/" > < meta name="DC.identifier" content="http://www.girlontheright.com" > Girl on the Right

 

Girl on the Right.

For Girls With Pearls.

  Contact RightGirl

Blogroll Me!

Site Feed

02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008

 

Thursday, April 07, 2005

Why Some Bans Are Okay 

It's interesting to see the way our scandal is playing out here in Canada, especially since Captain Ed helped us by breaking the news of what's been going on under our oblivious noses for all these years. Jugde Gomery placed a publication ban on testimony that incriminates not only Brault et al, but our entire Liberal government, from the bottom up. Funny, when you think how much of Martin's last campaign was based on clarity of government. So Ed circumvents the ban, and a whole mightly lot of us here in Canada out-and-out break it. We're laughing all the way to our prison cells, because Gomery and the Liberals are being likened to Stalinists for trying to supress this information.

But publication bans are nothing new. For decades we've sheilded anyone under the age of 18 (unless it was going to adult court), be they victim or accused. Few of us take issue with that. No one knows the name of the kid accusing Michael Jackson, or the one that accused him 12 years ago, either. We nod our heads and accept that, because they were just kids. The records from the Paul Bernardo/Karla Homolka case have been pretty much sealed, especially the videos that show the brutal sex killings of Kristin French and Leslie Mahaffy (not to mention the murder to Homolka's own younger sister, Tammy). That's as it should be. We don't need to have these snuff films getting into the wrong hands. It's not porn - it's three young girls who were murdered.

So why is this ban so different? Why does this one have us so angry we're willing to break the law? Well, because it's our government. We (not me, mind) elected these people based on our trust in them, and they have shown themselves to be swindlers and money launderers. Gomery might have put the ban in place to protect Brault, Guite and Coffin in their upcoming criminal trials, but Canadians have a right to know - in real time - what their politicians have been up to. This isn't about Brault's role so much as what he can tell us about the Liberal party. We have a situation right now where the Conservatives are holding back on a no confidence vote, because technically they're not supposed to know what the Liberal's have been doing. So it will drag out until after the ban is lifted, which could be as early as today. It will drag out, and Paul Martin (may I remind you once again that he was the former Finance Minister) and his band of merry theives will carry on collecting taxes from you and I, being paid their salaries out of our pockets, and they will not face the wrath of the voting public.

Because we're not supposed to know.

Bans are to protect the innocent, or those considered of an innocent age. They should not be put in place to sheild the guilty from justice.

|
 


  

 

 



 
 

  Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

 

 

 

This blog and its content - including opinions, observations, and general rants - is the sole property of RightGirl and Contributors (where applicable), and is not in any ways reflective of other persons or organizations, including the employer(s) of RightGirl and Contributors. Emails addressed to RightGirl are considered to be property of RightGirl, and may be used herewith. Should you prefer to have your name, email address, IP address or content withheld, please indicate this in the subject line of the email.

cocolaw.com

attorney4kids.com

wizardoflaw.com

RightWingStuff.com - Back-handing the Left into Submission! Support This Site

 

Copyright RightGirl 2004-2007© Stealing is for liberals and democrats.